The UK family law reform website covers a variety of subjects: Abduction, ADHD, Abuse, Artificial intelligence, Banks, Benefits, Blair, Boys, Brexit, Cancer, Cafcass, Care, Children, CIA, Court, Council tax, CSA, Depopulation, Diana, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Drugs, EU Military Unification, False allegations, Families, Fathers, Feminism, Fracking, Fukushima, Geoengineering Watch, Grenfell, HAARP, Homelessness, Hurricanes, Judges, The Kev Baker Show, David Kelly, Marriage, Money creation, NHS, Parents, Police, Rape, Sanctions, Saudi Arabia, Schools, Shared Parenting, Smart meters, Social workers, Soros, Suicide, Surveillance, Theresa May, Terror, Transgender, UK Column News, Unemployment, US, Vaxxed, Venezuela, Weather, Wi-Fi
Let the truth be our shepherd & god help us all.
Testimonies at Town Hall
The Secretary of state has a duty of care to protect the population from Non Ionizing radiation. Why then are the Council deploying experimental hazardous LED 5G lighting when they have already been warned of the risks especially to Vulnerable groups including our Children. Councils have a duty and must protect the population from toxic environmental pollution. Hundreds of thousands of Toxic Non Ionizing radiation including unnecessary LED light controllers increase the toxic levels of microwave radiation in air while the Optical radiation from the LED lights is not safe, as the Published uncontested science shows.
Why are the Council breaking
Former President Of Microsoft
Canada Frank Clegg: On Safety & 5G/Wireless Technologies
Dear Mr Mortimer
I write on behalf of the Council in respect of your request to attend the full Council meeting on 18th September and to ask two questions and video the response.
You have a designated point of contact in the Council (Jamie Fennell) who should be the only person you correspond with and to whom you should have made your request.
I set put below in blue your question and the Council’s response.
Question from Mr David Mortimer
Rollout of 5G in Milton Keynes
“I have come here tonight to raise my concern about the rollout of 5G in Milton Keynes given the adverse biological effects of RF radiation and to ask Milton Keynes Council to introduce the precautionary principle, given that the internationally-accepted guidelines from the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection only consider the thermal & not the biological effects?”
In England responsibility for radiological protection (including non-ionising radiation i.e. EMFs) currently lies with Public Health England.
The technology is being rolled out with Government support. As the “precautionary principle” is wider than Milton Keynes and it is the Government that is championing the project and simplifying planning requirements to implement it, responsibility is thought to lie at a national level.
Under permitted development planning authorities can only assess telecoms apparatus schemes under limited criteria (namely siting and appearance), and even under a planning application such matters are not covered by local or national planning policy.
Operators need to carry out development in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions”. Sometimes as good practice operators add relevant certification to accompany their applications, but it is not a requirement in planning terms.
There is currently a national consultation on new Permitted Development Rights Regulations until November, so the most appropriate way to raise such concerns could be by representation during that process.
“Please will you kindly clarify if Milton Keynes Council is aware RF radiation is classified as a pollutant and if Milton Keynes Council have a duty to protect its constituents from such a known pollutant?”
Operators need to carry out development in accordance with the Electronic Communications Code and the Environmental Protection Act. Sometimes as good practice operators add relevant certification to accompany their applications, but it is not a requirement in planning terms.
The Council is aware of the debate on RF radiation as a potential pollutant and health hazard. The assessment of these risks falls within the remit of Public Health England. The Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) is the expert committee who advises all Government departments and agencies on the health effects of natural and man-made radiation, both ionising and non-ionising. Local government would follow guidance issued by Central Government partners.
If you still intend to come to the Council meeting on 18th September to ask your question please can you confirm to Jamie Fennell (and on this occasion to cc to me).
Head of Legal and Deputy
Expert on 5g. Strabane here's
how your children will be affected
The Richie Allen Show Thursday
August 29th 2019
Everyone Must Know This!
Patrick Wood on 5G, global
control and freedom
Hong Kong Protests: A Warning
to The West
The Externalization of the
Hierarchy - Matrix of Perception
5G Crisis Summit
We have a broken governmental
system, that is controlled by industry,
5G - To Be Or Not To Be?
- An examination of the facts
Social Credit Scoring, Fighting
Dear Mark Lancaster,
Please will you kindly clarify if the law allows for adverse health effects to be used as a good reason to refuse the siting of a cell phone tower and if not would you raise this issue in the house as a matter of public health and help to protect your constituents from the adverse biological effects of RF radiation?
Professor expresses concerns
at health implications from 5G masts
How 5G violates the Nuremberg
Mark Steele, Microwave Weapons
Expert Warns EMF Tech Is A Weapons System
Stop 5G Global public group
5G money will not save anyone
Say no to roll out of untested