The UK family law reform website covers a variety of subjects: Abduction, ADHD, Abuse, Artificial intelligence, Banks, Benefits, Blair, Boys, Brexit, Cancer, Cafcass, Care, Children, CIA, Court, Council tax, CSA, Depopulation, Diana, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Drugs, EU Military Unification, False allegations, Families, Fathers, Feminism, Fracking, Fukushima, Geoengineering Watch, Grenfell, HAARP, Homelessness, Hurricanes, Judges, The Kev Baker Show, David Kelly, Marriage, Money creation, NHS, Parents, Police, Rape, Sanctions, Saudi Arabia, Schools, Shared Parenting, Smart meters, Social workers, Soros, Suicide, Surveillance, Theresa May, Terror, Transgender, UK Column News, Unemployment, US, Vaxxed, Venezuela, Weather, Wi-Fi
Let the truth be our shepherd & god help us all.
Testimonies at Town Hall
Sept 2019
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDEucwz2qo4
From: david@ukfamilylawreform.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 6:22 PM
To: Paul.Cummins@milton-keynes.gov.uk
Cc: Jamie.Fennell@Milton-keynes.gov.uk
Subject: Re: Your Question for Council Meeting
Dear Paul Cummins,
Public Health England has warned that high levels of blue light in LED
street lighting can be uncomfortable and are 'known to cause damage
to the retina’.
The Secretary of state has a duty of care to protect the population from Non Ionizing radiation. Why then are the Council deploying experimental hazardous LED 5G lighting when they have already been warned of the risks especially to Vulnerable groups including our Children. Councils have a duty and must protect the population from toxic environmental pollution. Hundreds of thousands of Toxic Non Ionizing radiation including unnecessary LED light controllers increase the toxic levels of microwave radiation in air while the Optical radiation from the LED lights is not safe, as the Published uncontested science shows.
Why are the Council breaking
the law?
Yours Sincerely
David Mortimer
Former President Of Microsoft
Canada Frank Clegg: On Safety & 5G/Wireless Technologies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSP2exnmJXg&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR17G3Ed3V9YPN2A2JtJyxGa-pF4JHuLkXNjl1h0eYhptxolIY4eVvnBKEk
From: Paul.Cummins@milton-keynes.gov.uk
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 5:17 PM
To: david@ukfamilylawreform.co.uk
Cc: Jamie.Fennell@Milton-keynes.gov.uk
Subject: Your Question for Council Meeting
Dear Mr Mortimer
I write on behalf of the Council in respect of your request to attend the full Council meeting on 18th September and to ask two questions and video the response.
You have a designated point of contact in the Council (Jamie Fennell) who should be the only person you correspond with and to whom you should have made your request.
I set put below in blue your question and the Council’s response.
Question from Mr David Mortimer
Rollout of 5G in Milton Keynes
“I have come here tonight to raise my concern about the rollout of 5G in Milton Keynes given the adverse biological effects of RF radiation and to ask Milton Keynes Council to introduce the precautionary principle, given that the internationally-accepted guidelines from the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection only consider the thermal & not the biological effects?”
Response:
In England responsibility for radiological protection (including non-ionising radiation i.e. EMFs) currently lies with Public Health England.
The technology is being rolled out with Government support. As the “precautionary principle” is wider than Milton Keynes and it is the Government that is championing the project and simplifying planning requirements to implement it, responsibility is thought to lie at a national level.
Under permitted development planning authorities can only assess telecoms apparatus schemes under limited criteria (namely siting and appearance), and even under a planning application such matters are not covered by local or national planning policy.
Operators need to carry out development in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions”. Sometimes as good practice operators add relevant certification to accompany their applications, but it is not a requirement in planning terms.
There is currently a national consultation on new Permitted Development Rights Regulations until November, so the most appropriate way to raise such concerns could be by representation during that process.
Supplementary Question.
“Please will you kindly clarify if Milton Keynes Council is aware RF radiation is classified as a pollutant and if Milton Keynes Council have a duty to protect its constituents from such a known pollutant?”
Operators need to carry out development in accordance with the Electronic Communications Code and the Environmental Protection Act. Sometimes as good practice operators add relevant certification to accompany their applications, but it is not a requirement in planning terms.
The Council is aware of the debate on RF radiation as a potential pollutant and health hazard. The assessment of these risks falls within the remit of Public Health England. The Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) is the expert committee who advises all Government departments and agencies on the health effects of natural and man-made radiation, both ionising and non-ionising. Local government would follow guidance issued by Central Government partners.
If you still intend to come to the Council meeting on 18th September to ask your question please can you confirm to Jamie Fennell (and on this occasion to cc to me).
Your sincerely
Paul Cummins
Head of Legal and Deputy
Monitoring Officer
T: 01908 254195
E: Paul.Cummins@milton-keynes.gov.uk
Visit us online at www.milton-keynes.gov.uk
Milton Keynes Council | Civic Offices | 1 Saxon Gate East | Central
Milton Keynes | MK9 3EJ
Expert on 5g. Strabane here's
how your children will be affected
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIfj60a0l2c
The Richie Allen Show Thursday
August 29th 2019
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/richieallen/episodes/2019-08-29T11_12_13-07_00
Everyone Must Know This!
ALERT MESSAGE..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlOBVf20cWs
Patrick Wood on 5G, global
control and freedom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWt-huceL3w
Hong Kong Protests: A Warning
to The West
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLzPHpNM2zg&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2r50B4SWPwQiHTl2aT9ahLG4o8hn4d_uBs96CeNxdLcCLe5zFpZXZbpnE
The Externalization of the
Hierarchy - Matrix of Perception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGHcXFSiaSg
5G Crisis Summit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pYk6-Q5LJ8
We have a broken governmental
system, that is controlled by industry,
which does not protect the public from what scientific evidence shows
to be harmful.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7U_u4trDgk&fbclid=IwAR0OKwZCX22LoHlfbiYNtfyYPDka1oT0vgQ1Ce505Qd2SDzdsjm4Piiea4c
5G - To Be Or Not To Be?
- An examination of the facts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRGSn_7qx1A&t=326s
Social Credit Scoring, Fighting
Surveillance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHjcnwMTM80&fbclid=IwAR3pjo2_CijylF5iSre0z-4rZYAJhSBN9tZJY6k_GzB3QpPPgHP3gmXL4XA
5G Is it Safe?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSh3pmMSfw0&fbclid=IwAR1I68GsN98H5etknDmFuQSRBhYlRq70RzjCtXPL-m99WQ3qQAX8rC7P1KA
From: david@ukfamilylawreform.co.uk
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 4:09 PM
To: officeofmarklancaster@parliament.uk
Subject: Protect your constituents from RF radiation
Dear Mark Lancaster,
Please will you kindly clarify if the law allows for adverse health effects to be used as a good reason to refuse the siting of a cell phone tower and if not would you raise this issue in the house as a matter of public health and help to protect your constituents from the adverse biological effects of RF radiation?
Yours Sincerely
David Mortimer
Professor expresses concerns
at health implications from 5G masts
https://soundcloud.com/oceanfm/professor-expresses-concerns-at-health-implications-from-5g-masts?fbclid=IwAR1_gFcf7WPMlX_cCTqV8sRywmmgtIaWvzi13deLM1nU68hBOAPNn9RN9oQ
How 5G violates the Nuremberg
Code.
https://www.facebook.com/367542343889100/videos/386598868919629/
Mark Steele, Microwave Weapons
Expert Warns EMF Tech Is A Weapons System
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxJJucrI9-o
Stop 5G Global public group
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KqOvO3kv_s
5G money will not save anyone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvFbqC6NxA
The more people learn about 5G' the more concerned they will become.
Say no to roll out of untested
5G
http://ravenseyemedia.com/5g.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3InuJJaXw2AglRoNR9ayRiG2tNY_YH0rxcyUlQW7y8dmdf1GowMPDDkSU
http://www.ukfamilylawreform.co.uk/wifi.htm
http://www.ukfamilylawreform.co.uk/smartmeters.htm
http://www.ukfamilylawreform.co.uk/artificialintelligence.htm